ThinkTWENTY20

  • HOME
  • ERIC'S BLOG
  • FORUM
      • Hey! What's New?
  • ABOUT US
  • REGISTER
      • ThoughtLeader Gateway
  • EVENTS

The Legal “CoFfEE” to Accounting’s “TEA”

on 07 January 2020

Continuous (external) audit processes wouldn’t be complete without some way to gather enough information about an enterprise’s commitments and contingencies to limit the risks of material misstatement.

Only because I am obsessed with acronyms and mnemonics, and because a continuous accounting environment (the theory of which was published five years before Bitcoin) is called “Triple Entry Accounting” (or TEA), I’ve decided to call this continuous capture and reporting environment for commitments and contingencies “Coffee”: COntingency Filesystem for External Evidence.

I’m not saying it will be easy to capture all of this information for the filesystem, and there is usually far less cooperation around legal proceedings than there are for trade transactions. It’s difficult enough to get periodic legal representation from internal/in-house (ISA 580) and external (ISA 501) counsel. There are many issues here, where client-attorney confidentiality is only one. A system that exposes all issues that an enterprise (say Company XYZ) refers to its attorneys is only part of the picture; without an “outgoing” system that also tracks issues that other enterprises refer to their attorneys involving Company XYZ, and that information is not in a single shared system. Add to that the convention that corporate policy doesn’t permit public discussion or disclosure, as that may have “a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter.”

 Now the world may be ready for tea before the coffee’s ready, but it is important for decision makers to understand there might be some major surprises.

Leave a comment

    Comments

    • No comments found
    Powered by Komento
    Forum Recent Posts
    Data For Sustainability Disclosures
    Monday, 11 September 2023

    By Gerald Trites
    Industry generally, because of legislation and stakeholder demands trying to move towards net-zero carbon emissions. Measuring progress in this endeavour calls for data that may not be available or may not be consumable because of formatting and general system disparities. Companies are working to rectify this situation and gain ready available to the needed data. It can be a big job.

    Equipment being used for production, travel, deliveries etc. that generates carbon emissions often is older and does not have the sensors needed to measure emissions. It may not be practical to replace that equipment so add-ons are often needed to capture it. That will take time to resolve.

    In the meantime, companies are left with finding ways to do useful estimates. The data – actual and estimates - needs to be fed into their processes and systems to be useful.

    Companies are working on this, especially utilities and energy companies, mostly on scope one emissions. Scope two and three emissions are even harder to deal with from a data viewpoint, because they are outside the direct control of the company.

    Check out this article which explains the issue well.

    The Need for Better Awareness of AI's Downfalls
    Monday, 21 August 2023

    By Gerald Trites

    “A recent study by the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) shows that Canadians are diving into new AI tools with excitement but are missing out on understanding the potential downsides.”

    Especially since the advent of ChatGPT, the use of AI in various arenas has been expanding quickly. Everyone is talking about it but not everyone is aware of the issues it presents. This is slowly changing, since many people are experimenting with Generative AI and learning that it doesn’t always produce reliable results. In fact, sometimes it invents its own inaccurate results. This can be annoying but becomes a serious problem if the AI is being used, for example, for medical diagnosis.

    ThinkTWENTY20 © 2023. Privacy Policy