ThinkTWENTY20

  • HOME
  • ERIC'S BLOG
  • FORUM
  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • REGISTER
      • ThoughtLeader Gateway
  • Home | 
  • ERIC'S BLOG | 
  • Clarifying Auditor Coverage and Connecting for Context: Data Level Assurance

Clarifying Auditor Coverage and Connecting for Context: Data Level Assurance

on 03 September 2019

When XBRL was in its infancy, much of my attention was spent trying to improve the intersection between the auditor’s report and management’s financial statement.

(click on the title to read the full article)

Others could focus on “comparability” or facilitating the numbers jumping into spreadsheet models. One of the directions I was tasked with was establishing new ways to make clearer what was covered by the auditor’s report, and what was not. Twenty years later, that remains an open item, despite our early efforts.

The auditor’s report (ISA 700, AS 3101, AU-C 700) normally begins with an introductory paragraph that tells what part(s) of the associated presentation falls under the auditor’s scrutiny. The PCAOB refers to “[a} statement identifying each financial statement and any related schedule(s) that has been audited” and “the financial statements, including the related notes and any related schedule(s)”, while ISA speaks to “the title of each statement comprising the financial statements” and “the notes, including the summary of significant accounting policies”.

Perhaps that is clear enough, although there was evidence that readers often didn’t know what, beyond the basics on paper, was included or excluded. And there isn’t much room for expansion – such as 2011-2013, when the PCAOB considered expanding the opinion letter for information outside of the financial statements, such as MD&A or non-GAAP information or earning releases – how could the introductory paragraph make the difference clear for a human reader without keeping their finger on the auditor’s report while reading the financial statement?

But providing an automated tool to explicitly highlight what is covered by the Auditor’s report or, conversely, what is not, was something we saw XBRL able to facilitate. The auditor could point to the facts included in their coverage, and then highlighting could be turned on or off.

This was just a beginning. If there was more than one kind of assurance involved – such as reasonable assurance on some content and limited on other content (and nothing obvious on some more, and none on the rest), the new platform could support it. Or If different materiality levels, or degrees of stochastic assurance, or other options were present, or even different auditors opined on different parts of the same report, the new platform could expand.

I called this “data level assurance” – not necessarily because the (immediate) goal was getting rid of “taken as a whole” or “true and fair view”/”fairly represented” … but because we were going to leverage the power of XML to move beyond a document, give it or take it, to machine help based on the content. One might consider this focus on an existing presentation very backward; it does not move forward the concept of a data approach, where the data plus the necessary context, not tied to a specific presentation, becomes the document of record, which is a path I do believe in; I was merely trying to leverage XBRL to make the traditional report with assurance more transparent to readers. The primary existing example of XBRL assurance, found in the Netherlands, still relies on a normative presentation, now known as the Consistent Presentation (CP) (https://www.sbr-nl.nl/sbr-international/what-sbr/assurance).

My colleague on ThinkTwenty20.com, Editor in Chief Gerald Trites, led a CICA Study Group on Data Level Assurance in 2011, in which I participated, and wrote a research study on the topic. So I am in good company here. 

What do you think? Is the introductory paragraph, with what is covered by the auditor’s report, a fine place for what the future will hold? Or will more explicit, interactive tools be helpful, necessary, and worth pushing for? Can we get past management’s presentation, or a single, consistent, normative presentation defined by a third party and get to assurance on data in context rather than data as presented?

 

Leave a comment

    Comments

    • No comments found
    Powered by Komento
    Forum Recent Posts
    Data Driven Sustainability Decisions
    Tuesday, 03 May 2022

    Gerald Trites, FCA, CISA

    While companies have traditionally viewed sustainability decisions as separate from monetary decisions, this is changing. It’s partly because of generational changes, with millennials now being the largest component of the workplace and partly considerations driven by customer demand, investor demand regulatory requirement and common-sense observation of the destruction caused by climate change. Compelling reasons.

    Companies have been moving more clearly to data driven decision making for several years. So it makes sense they would turn to data to drive their decisions in the sustainability area.  

    To accomplish this, they need to first define their sustainability goals. This usually begins with industry trends and information from stakeholders about their sustainability concerns and the development of a sustainability strategic plan. Second, begins the process of data modelling and analysis drawn from internal and external sources. Many organizations have well defined data gathering processes already in place, but these need to be modified to take into account sustainability goals. Finally, the adoption of data driven sustainability decision making requires the adoption of AI techniques to automate data gathering, modelling and reporting functions.

    Established enterprise systems are moving in this direction, the availability of which, as well as their compatibility with existing systems, is an important consideration.

    Overall, a creative combination of data management, analytics, AI and integration of sustainability processes with established corporate processes are crucial to a successful outcome – the creation of a truly sustainable enterprise.

    How All Accounting Reports Will be Digitized
    Thursday, 31 March 2022

    Gerald Trites, FCA

    The SEC was the major regulatory body that got the ball rolling in 2009, when it mandated rules for the use of the interactive data format (XBRL) for public company financial statements. Then several other countries and organizations got on the band wagon. There was a relatively quiet period for a few years, when the new electronic form of reporting seemed stalled. But then the EU stepped in and began requiring their ESEF filings in 2021. That meant most of the major companies in the world were using digitized reporting.

    For regulators and governments, digital filing of reports has been an opportunity to streamline the processing and analysis of the reports. Users such as investors, on the other hand, have often been unsure about what to do with these reports.

    The fact is, much attention has been given in recent years to the production of digital reports, but very little given to their consumption. True, there are utilities that can be purchased to enable people to read reports in digitized form, the SEC provides such a one, and the recent moves to inline XBRL mean the reports can be read in the conventional way, (ESEF is a variation on inline XBRL). But most of these attempts to render digital reports readable cater to the idea of sequential reading in the conventional sense. Most people do not read this way, unless perhaps they are reading a novel. When they want information, they tend to go to that information as fast as they can. This is the standard approach most people follow in using the internet. People don’t read the internet. Nor generally do they read a corporate website from beginning to end. That would be bizarre!

    But yet, we provide annual reports in paper or PDF form, which extend to around 150 pages and often more, of difficult, often technical, material and expect people to read them. It doesn’t happen. Professional analysts might, but they are more likely to employ analytical tools to get the information they need.

    There is an excellent article on the website of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) by Amir Ghandar, titled “The Accounting Revolution Will Be Digitized”.[1] In that article, Mr Ghandar points out that “A 2D, static annual report format in paper or pdf is not that different to the papyrus on which Egyptian scribes reported on the royal inventories more than 7,000 years ago.”

    Much more than this is needed in the modern world. Technology and complexity have advanced tremendously and the style of reporting needs to keep pace.

    Two areas need further work. One involves the steps necessary to encourage legislators and regulators in countries to adopt digital reporting. While a majority of countries have adopted it, there is still a number who haven’t. Then there is the need to take the steps to change digital reporting to make it more understandable and usable to the users. This means providing the resources for them to actually draw out the data they want. These resources need to be made available along with the reports themselves. Some companies in their websites have started doing this, through the provision of data banks and some analytical tools, however it needs to become commonplace and much more powerful and sweeping.

    Developing this approach to corporate reporting requires interaction and discussion between corporate reporters and users, regulators and standards-setters to address the issues.

    Those issues involve more than figuring out how to present digital information and how to use it. It involves determining what information to present, how to present it and when. It involves looking back at the basic tenets that have ruled accounting since its beginnings. The need for annual and other periodic reports. Can they be continuous? Can we eliminate the need for those pesky annual accounting judgements that cause so much trouble? Can we include the tools for analysis within the disclosures rather than relying on the software industry to deliver them? This cannot be accomplished within paper or pdf reports, but rather on the corporate websites. Most companies have moved their reporting to their websites. But they generally have ported over the old paper paradigm, rather than seriously adopting new and innovative ways to report in the information age. It’s well past time we did that.

    https://www.ifac.org/knowledge-gateway/contributing-global-economy/discussion/accounting-revolution-will-be-digitized

     

    [1] https://www.ifac.org/knowledge-gateway/contributing-global-economy/discussion/accounting-revolution-will-be-digitized

    ThinkTWENTY20 © 2022. Privacy Policy
    Login

    username / password