ThinkTWENTY20

ThinkTWENTY20

  • HOME
  • ERIC'S BLOG
  • FORUM
  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
  • Home | 
  • ERIC'S BLOG | 
  • A Vision for the Future of Corporate Reporting (Part 4): Effective Communication – A Dialogue?

A Vision for the Future of Corporate Reporting (Part 4): Effective Communication – A Dialogue?

on 14 November 2020

Can corporate reporting be “more effective and engaging for all those with an interest” in an organization? Is technology a facilitator, and can it be a greater facilitator? And is a “feedback loop” between management and the stakeholders a necessary part of that process?

We are continuing a series of blog entries specifically about the FRC’s (UK’s Financial Reporting Council) A Matter of Principles: The Future of Corporate Reporting, a discussion paper published in October 2020 with comments requested by February 5, 2021. In this entry, we are focusing on one sentence within the principle-based document:

In our view, good corporate reporting should seek to create an active dialogue between a company and its stakeholders about issues that matter to them. Continuous reflection on how well corporate reporting facilitates meaningful engagement should, in turn, invite continuous improvement and practice-led innovation.

That statement may evoke many responses, including,

  • Has it been common practice to develop reports meant to be provocative and promote a dialogue, rather than focus on being a one-way communication vehicle with sufficient, relevant information for decision making?
  • While thought-leadership documents, such as “The Future of Corporate Reporting,” often come with guidance on questions seeking a response, are there any channels in place to promote, collect and provide responses to facilitate a dialogue?
  • Can standards such as XBRL facilitate such a dialogue?
  • Should the dialogue be only between the reporting organization and the stakeholder, or are there others in the business reporting/audit information supply chain who might be involved as well?

We begin by reminding our readers that these blog entries are themselves an effort not only to post an opinion or provide a one-way communication channel, but to be provocative enough to encourage responses in the form of questions and helpful opinions. You are invited to leave your questions and comments on the bottom of most blog pages or by clicking on “Contact Us.”

While stockholder meetings and investor relations pages offer an opportunity to ask questions, I do not normally think of the management-stakeholder relationship as one held up as a natural dialogue. Online financial statements do not lend themselves to digging in for more information or for alternative views.

I am reminded once again of the feedback cycle developed in conjunction with my colleague, Harm Jan van Burg, who initially masterminded what has become Standard Business Reporting. His goals with the Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) were not focused on making end-reporting information more easily discoverable and consumable by stakeholders; indeed, XBRL was designed to facilitate the iterative processes leading up to those reports. His idea was to facilitate a standards-based feedback loop. Reporting-based pronouncements would use the standardized terms; instructions and interpretations would use them; reports would use them; software would use them; and questions and feedback could be sent with laser targeting to the right person to explain the rules, the guidance, the reporting, the assurance and so on.

Active and effective dialogues should leverage tools like XBRL metadata, and reporting should involve the entire supply chain, not just the reporter and the consumer.

Leave a comment

    Comments

    • No comments found
    Powered by Komento
    Forum Recent Posts
    Where Will Technology Progress Take The Accounting Profession?
    Monday, 29 March 2021

    By Ricardo Rodil
    Ricardo Rodil leads the capital markets advisory services division at Crowe Macro (Brazil).

    Every time I try to understand or analyze a very complex event,  I usually try to reduce the problem to its essential elements – a sort of inverted zoom lens. I know that the devil is in the details, but I need to have some distance from them. So, I formulate extreme hypotheses, thinking about all the possible/plausible results (from 8 thru 8,000, as we say in Brazil). And, of capital importance, I know I need to keep my mind open to all possibilities. Today, I want to share with you where my latest thoughts have led me, about where and how technology is progressing and how that is transforming our lives.

    The Tele-Everything World
    Saturday, 20 March 2021

    In a non-random survey of some 915 innovators, developers, business and policy leaders, researchers and activists were asked by Pew Research to consider what life will be like in 2025 in the wake of the outbreak of the global pandemic. Overall they saw life being made worse for many people because of the spread of mis-information and authoritarianism and the fact people will become a lot more reliant on technology, which will serve to widen the economic divide.

    ThinkTWENTY20 © 2021. Privacy Policy